What is Searchviews?

Searchviews is the company blog of Reprise Media. We impart daily insights on Search Marketing, Social Media and SEO. Read More...

Contact Us

Send us a message at searchviews@
reprisemedia.com


Search

Archives


MyBlogLog - Readers

« Previous
Home
Next »

Best Practices: Online Marketing Voyeurs and the Consumer Exhibitionists Who Want to Be Watched

Written By Noah Mallin | June 9, 2008 | Share This |

XRay Vision

Cast your minds back to the primordial past – you know, ten years ago when the ‘net was poised to deliver the most personalized user experience imaginable with targeted, relevant advertising at every new page. What happened?

I’m still being subjected to ads about stuff that I’m totally uninterested in. Check out this series of ads that were embedded on the New York Post homepage when I went there to check on the latest Lohan family news:

contextual ad

I’ll admit the teeth thing was close to home but my lips are actually quite large. Lip plumping is a very low priority for me. As for moving and storage, I’m not going anywhere or planning on storing anything.

Contextual ads (in this case from Quigo AdSonar but it applies to all of them) only take into account the content of the website and page, which means they are often wide of the mark because they are clueless as to why a user is there. Even more problematic from a targeting perspective is that the adspace on a given page is going to be filled by something so if there are no contextually relevant ads something else will end up there. In fact our own Kate Zimmermann blogged about the shortcomings of contextual ads in her post on the Virginia Tech shootings. This is certainly not the targeted webtopia we were promised.

Behavioral marketing was supposed to change all of this by building private detailed user profiles that marketers could use to better serve relevant advertising. Marketers would be blocked from knowing any personal data such as name, social security number etc, but they would be able to target against geographic location, websites visited, click-throughs, searches performed, time on particular sites, and types of downloads.

For instance, they would know that before visiting the New York Post website that I had visited E! Online for the latest on their reality show/ train wreck parenting guide The Lohans and before that I had gone to Amazon.com where I purchased a CD. I might then be served up a behaviorally targeted ad for an upcoming Lindsay Lohan concert in New York City via Ticketmaster. This is not to say that behavioral marketing doesn’t come with it’s own set of challenges.

This week’s issue of The Economist features not one, but two (!) pieces on online behavioral targeting of advertisements. The main article delves into the controversial side of behavioral targeting in Britain, where Phorm has signed up the three biggest ISPs to use their system. These service providers would love to be able to find a way to further monetize their subscriber data and take a chunk of all that tasty ad revenue Google has been raking in. They are also the best natural resource of data for behavioral marketing for the obvious reason that they are the one constant in a user’s online experience. Though Tacoda and AlmondNet are both leaders in behavioral targeting it has been Phorm that has been targeting ISPs most successfully as data partners.

So far, so swell but when you are dealing with people’s online behavior it pays to be upfront, transparent, and careful. Phorm tested their system with British Telecom for two years without the knowledge and consent of BT’s customers. This tends to send a red flag to consumers who are already concerned about internet privacy. The fact that most ISP’s seem to be envisioning an “opt-out” system rather than an “opt-in” also suggests some ham-handedness when dealing with their customers.

The reality is that behavioral targeting done right, respecting privacy and consent, ought to deliver the experience we were all expecting ten years ago — relevant advertising that actually delivers useful information to the consumer. The second Economist article is an editorial and it echoes this sentiment. To whit:

“Attempts to sneak in behavioural-targeting systems through the back door could give a promising idea a bad name. Done properly, behavioural targeting promises to make advertising more relevant for consumers, to increase conversion rates for advertisers and to make online publishers’ advertising slots more valuable (since even slots on obscure web pages can have relevant ads placed in them).”

Hear hear and jolly good show! Pardon me for lapsing into my mock British-ese but its hard not to when quoting a magazine in which letters to the editor are all addressed to “SIR”.

Back in the good ol’ U.S. of A, the FTC has issued a report titled Protecting Consumers in the Next Tech-Ade (yes, your tax dollars contributed to that god-awful title) which in typical fashion refuses to take a stance on behavioral marketing other than to note public concern. They do call on the industry to regulate itself, which we agree with. Don’t muddy up a good tool that can enhance both the users experience and the advertiser’s effectiveness by being deceptive.

When Google launched their GMail E-mail service they positioned targeted ads as one of the benefits of their service. People who were uncomfortable with the idea knew upfront that this was part and parcel of the experience and others who were intrigued signed up in droves. In the end it has proven to be enormously popular, proving a maxim that we here at SearchViews hold dear: “Don’t try to hoodwink your users.” Eventually as with British Telecom’s secret trial run with Phorm and Gene Simmon’s horrible webcam-captured mating act if it’s out there people will find it and blog about it and post it.

Hopefully as behavioral targeting becomes more standardized it will be in the spirit of the enlightened experience we were promised many moons ago. A happy internet experience where advertising is relevant to the user and knows the difference between looking for The Lohans, Lo-Pan and Willie Loman. I think a lot of consumers would gladly opt for that.

Topics: Advertising: Behavioral, Advertising: Contextual, Advertising: Online, Google, Technology, Web Analytics |

« Previous
Home
 Next »

One Response to “Best Practices: Online Marketing Voyeurs and the Consumer Exhibitionists Who Want to Be Watched”


  1. Universal Search: Clueless! – ISP’s act like AP, Greed for Money Upfront will lead to a Kick in the Rear | Searchviews - Daily insights on Search Marketing, Social Media and SEO by Reprise Media. [ June 17th, 2008 at 5:26 pm ]

    […] sampling. We at SearchViews have advocated for the idea of integrating behavioral marketing at the ISP level. Now that would be a creative way to make more money. Perhaps they could take a lesson from Google […]


Comments